What would be the opposite of a society that placed no restrictions on development of natural resorces for profit.
$19517.2
Real Private Fixed Investment in Structures by Type, Chained Dollars
Our current global capitalism socioeconomic system was engineered by heads of global corporations in conjunction with political leaders. It started with the Powell memo and over the last 30 years these "leaders" have engineered a system to transfer wealth from the 90% at the bottom of the economic ladder to the top 1%, with a suitable amount also flowing to the top 10% of wealth holder. The graph makes it clear as day when this transition took place.
This is a systems engineering problem. The solution is building a more robust infrastructure that cannot be damaged and tuning the feedback in the system to operate with a steady state. Also, the distribution of energy input into the system must guard against power distribution instabilities and the energy input must steadily grow in order to grow the wealth of the system as a whole.
“To summarize: Three steps must be taken to smash the war racket. 1. We must take the profit out of war. 2. We must permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there should be war. 3. We must limit our military forces to home defense purposes.”
...
“Let the workers in these plants get the same wages -- all the workers, all presidents, all executives, all directors, all managers, all bankers -- yes, and all generals and all admirals and all officers and all politicians and all government office holders -- everyone in the nation be restricted to a total monthly income not to exceed that paid to the soldier in the trenches! Let all these kings and tycoons and masters of business and all those workers in industry and all our senators and governors and majors pay half of their monthly $30 wage to their families and pay war risk insurance and buy Liberty Bonds. Why shouldn't they? They aren't running any risk of being killed or of having their bodies mangled or their minds shattered. They aren't sleeping in muddy trenches. They aren't hungry. The soldiers are! Give capital and industry and labor thirty days to think it over and you will find, by that time, there will be no war. That will smash the war racket -- that and nothing else. Maybe”
...
“A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes. In”
...
“Only those who would be called upon to risk their lives for their country should have the privilege of voting to determine whether the nation should go to war. There”
...
“Victory or defeat will be determined by the skill and ingenuity of our scientists. If we put them to work making poison gas and more and more fiendish mechanical and explosive instruments of destruction, they will have no time for the constructive job of creating greater prosperity for all peoples.”
...
― Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket: The Antiwar Classic by America's Most Decorated Soldier
https://publications.wri.org/transformations-equitable-sustainable-cities
With many cities already struggling to meet people's basic needs, global development and climate challenges are increasingly urban challenges. A sustainable future depends on whether cities can transform. Is there a path to transformative change that can make cities more prosperous, more equal, and low-carbon at the same time?
...
We need radical shifts in the way we use energy, produce food, manage land, and live in cities. And we must invest much more in building resilience. Trillions of dollars of stimulus spending for COVID-19 recovery has opened a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reset and reshape our economies-but it must be a green recovery. We must invest in more equitable and sustainable cities that are better prepared for the next crisis.
...
A handful of forward-thinking cities have made breakthroughs in recent years. But most cities remain on the path of unequal, unsafe, polluting growth while re-creating known failures. We need to rapidly transform how all cities around the world are built, managed, and experienced.
...
we can create the cities we need only if we focus on ending inequality and invigorating livelihoods. But there is no time to waste.